Search results
You searched in
Business Advice Directory
all "£50,000 cap on all tribunal awards?"
related advice.There are 10 results
It’s been widely reported that the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill will “slash tribunal awards” when it becomes law. Is this correct?
Published 18.06.2012
The government intends to introduce a new “employee-owner” employment status in April 2013. In return for shares in the employer’s company, the individual will waive certain statutory rights. OK -
but what’s been kept very quiet?
Published 31.10.2012
It was recently reported that tribunal awards for discrimination-based claims have reached a record high of £9 million. But pick apart the research and you’ll see a very different picture. So what’s
the real story?
Published 28.08.2012
The Ministry of Justice recently confirmed that fees for employment tribunal claims will be introduced in the middle of next year. It’s about time too! So what’s on the cards for employees who have
an axe to grind?
Published 06.09.2012
When calculating compensation, the tribunal can take into account all future financial losses. However, a new Court of Appeal ruling has laid down clear guidelines that appear to curb this power.
What’s the latest?
Published 20.06.2011
When the new Deregulation Bill becomes law, the tribunal will lose the power to make “wider recommendations” in discrimination-based claims. Why will this change benefit every employer?
Published 05.06.2013
Of course you know that if you unfairly dismiss an employee you’ll have to pay the price - compensation will be awarded against you. But is this all you’ll have to worry about? Are there any hidden
costs too?
Published 09.03.2006
From February 1 2011, the maximum amount that the tribunal can award for a successful unfair dismissal claim will be £80,400. So why is this and do you really need to worry about it?
Published 10.01.2011
A major law firm has recently been ordered to pay a male employee over £123,000 in compensation after its redundancy selection criteria unfairly favoured a woman on maternity leave. What can you
learn from this unusual case?
Published 01.06.2010
Search all items in entire site